motion for protective order interrogatories california

The parties may agree to provisions: Protecting the disclosure of commercially sensitive information, such as, For handling the inadvertent production of information covered by the. vs. Contact us. move for a protective order. through __ of Set One, on the grounds that no declaration for additional discovery was included as UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA PRO SE CIVIL GUIDEBOOK August 2021 This Guidebook is intended to be an informative and practical resource for understanding the basic procedures of the Court.The statements in this Guidebookdo not constitute legal advice. Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. IV. (a) Subject to the right of the responding party to seek a protective order under Section 2030.090, any party who attaches a supporting declaration as described in Section 2030.050 may propound a greater number of specially prepared interrogatories to another party if this greater number is warranted because of any of the following: (1) The complexity or the quantity of the existing and potential issues in the particular case. Scope, Purpose and Construction. terms are defined by California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, and 260, which have been . DISC-002 Form Interrogatories- Employment Law. 2071 and Fed. may order that the party to whom the demand was directed provide or permit the discovery (c) The court shall grant a motion under subdivision (b) if it determines that all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) The initial failure of the responding party to answer the interrogatory correctly has substantially prejudiced the party who propounded the interrogatory. The Supreme Court reversed a decision of the California Court of Appeal that would have precluded PAGA plaintiffs from obtaining the contact information of other potentially aggrieved employees beyond the discrete location at which they work (ed) without first making a threshold evidentiary showing that (a) they were aggrieved employees and (b) (3) That the place of production be other than that specified in the demand. Thus, the objections are a nullity without a motion for a protective order. #379 The Printed: 2/25/2021 02/25/2021 Motion: Protective Order r ZOlsrerV7283061 Page 1 0f 5 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MINUTE ORDER deposition notice shall state all 0f the following, in at least 12-point type: . None of the questions in this set of interrogatories is being propounded for any improper purpose, such as to harass the party, or the attorney for the party, to whom it is directed, or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. AMOUNT OF $_________, MEMORANDUM OF (e) If the court finds good cause for the production of electronically stored information The court shall make the order unless it finds that (1) the request was held objectionable pursuant to Rule 36.01, or (2) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (3) the party failing to admit had reasonable ground to believe that the party might prevail on the matter, or (4) there was other good reason for the failure to . tmlt tmh fjthrrckltcrfhs lrh jct cvhr`rclb ljb, cpprhssfvh cr vlkuh ljb le`fkucus, ljb (") tmlt tmh fjthrrckltcrfhs lrh jct h#nhssfvh ljb whrh, aurtmhr rh%uhsts tmh sue ca &'''' fj sljntfcjs lklfjst, 04!444 cj tmh krcujbs tmlt tmh ecvfjk plrty, afohb tmhfr ectfcj acr l prcthntfvh crbhr wftmcut l smcwfjk, mh Cppcsftfcj smloo `h `lshb cj tmfs Cppcsftfcj, tmh lttlnmhb ehecrljbue ca pcfjts ljb, lutmcrftfhs, tmh bhnolrltfcj ca '''''''''''ljb h#mf`fts lttlnmhb tmhrhtc, cj tmh ncepohth afohs ljb, rhncrbs ca tmfs lntfcj, ljb cj sunm ctmhr crlo ljb*cr bcnuehjtlry hvfbhjnh ls ely `h prhshjthb lt tmh, lthb'''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''', tc ycur plrtfnuolr sftultfcj. Sample motion for consolidation in unlawful detainer (eviction) in California, Sample motion to dismiss for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3). because of undue burden or expense shall bear the burden of demonstrating that the 5. (c) The party or affected person who seeks a protective order regarding the production, and Plaintiff's only fact witness to the alleged infringements. CV-4L.pdf. (b) A motion under subdivision (a) shall be made a sufficient time in advance of the time limit for the completion of discovery under Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2024.010) to permit the deposition of any expert to whom the motion relates to be taken within that time limit. Why is the court reopening discovery on cases where the discovery cut-off date had passed By whitelisting SlideShare on your ad-blocker, you are supporting our community of content creators. (f) No specially prepared interrogatory shall contain subparts, or a compound, conjunctive, or disjunctive question. B. if the demanding party shows good cause, subject to any limitations imposed under CEB Judges Perspective at 15.72 gives the best advice: The proposed order is a means for the advocate to frame for the court exactly the relief the moving party wants., e.g., who be excluded from a deposition or which requests the moving party must answer when a challenge to a declaration of necessity is sustained. The responding party shall then afford to the propounding party a reasonable opportunity to examine, audit, or inspect these documents and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or summaries of them. 2030.410 Use of Interrogatory Answers at Trial. 1. Provide a discovery history regarding the motion in a time line laid out like the one below: 1/2/12 Each of the three plaintiffs served a separate set of 35 specially prepared interrogatories, and 75 requests fordocuments on each of the five defendants for a total of 1225 specially prepared interrogatories and 1125 requests for documents. Motion for Protective Order ( 2025.420, 2019.030) 4. By accepting, you agree to the updated privacy policy. (a) Within 30 days after service of interrogatories, the party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall serve the original of the response to them on the propounding party, unless on motion of the propounding party the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the responding party the court has extended the time for response. 2030.080 Service of Interrogatories on All Parties. (Cal. Also, make sure to list the nature and tile of all documents to be attached. REASONABLE GOOD FAITH ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE INFORMALLY. P. 83. California Civil Discovery Charts for the Everyday Litigator Katherine L. Gallo . Unfortunately, in many cases like the above scenario, you are going to have to file a motion for protective order. (2) The partys failure to serve a timely response was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. If the initial set of interrogatories does not exhaust this limit, the balance may be propounded in subsequent sets. (b) Except as provided in Section 2030.070, no party shall, as a matter of right, propound to any other party more than 35 specially prepared interrogatories. 9___________ %n san*t%ons aa%nst _____________________. Describe in detail that the information opposing counsel has already obtained through discovery is sufficient to proceed in trial and that (as in the case of the above example) the discovery is retaliatory for not settling. Superior Court of the State of California The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided. 05/2018: CV-004M : Temporary . The notice is to tell the court and opposing party not only the name, date, time and location of the motion, but the nature of the order sought as well. Family Violence Ex Parte Protective Order. The court concluded that " [s]erving the initial 723 interrogatories violated the Los Angeles County Superior Court Civility Guidelines. RECORD HEREIN: (d) If the party or affected person from whom discovery of electronically stored information Relying on Snyder, Bibhu, and similar cases, the court concluded that Sbriglio filed her Bankruptcy Rule 2004 request for the "improper purpose" of obtaining discovery for use in the Derivative Actionlitigation in which Cambridge was not a defendant. of the issues in the litigation, and the importance of the requested discovery in The SlideShare family just got bigger. (2) This subdivision shall not be construed to alter any obligation to preserve discoverable (2) An exercise of the option to produce documents under Section 2030.230 is unwarranted or the required specification of those documents is inadequate. 2030.020 Timing For Serving Interrogatories. (3) The party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action (b) The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to . On motion, with or without notice, the court may relieve the party from this requirement on its determination that service on all other parties would be unduly expensive or burdensome. For more information about protective orders in federal court, see, Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/I0f9fbe36ef0811e28578f7ccc38dcbee/Protective-Order?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Practice Note, Protective Orders: Overview (Federal). (a) A party may propound to another party either or both of the following: (1) Thirty-five specially prepared interrogatories that are relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. (c) Unless notice of this motion is given within 45 days of the service of the response, or any supplemental response, or on or before any specific later date to which the propounding party and the responding party have agreed in writing, the propounding party waives any right to compel a further response to the interrogatories. An interrogatory is not objectionable because an answer to it involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or would be based on information obtained or legal theories developed in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial. At the trial of the action, the propounding party or any other party may use the initial answer under Section 2030.410, and the responding party may then use the amended answer. The sample motion also requests sanctions. Sacramento, CA 95834, Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution. 2030.060 Format of Interrogatories, Requirement That Interrogatories Be Full and Complete, Prohibition of Sub-parts, Prohibition of Continuing Duty to Respond. However, because you have to file the Motion for Protective Order promptly, it is best that you lay out your legal and factual arguments in this letter and drop it into your motion. After his rant, I said to him that You Need to file a motion for a protective order. It was clear to me that the discovery was retaliatory, either because the case didnt settle the week before at mediation, or that the opposing counsel was a nut job, or perhaps a little of both. However, the court is unlikely to issue a protective order based upon the anticipation of improper conduct during a deposition. C.C.P. !or, Th%s mot%on %s #as$ +&on th%s not%*, th, Do not sell or share my personal information. Who May Apply for Order. A protective order protects the person from being forced to submit to the harmful or inappropriate discovery request. On the last day to serve written discovery, Plaintiff counsel had served each of his five clients, on behalf of each of her three plaintiffs, a separate set of 50 specially prepared interrogatories, 35 requests for documents, 70 requests for admissions and 17.1 of the Form Interrogatories for a total 750 specially prepared interrogatories and 525 requests for documents, 1050 requests for admissions and 4200 responses to Form Interrogatory 17.1 equaling 6525 discovery requests to be responded to 30 days before trial. 203025) BRADLEY J. HERREMA (State Bar No. On April 22, 2020, the Presiding Judge of the . 8 SPEND TIME ON YOUR DECLARATION outlining the discovery history in this case as well as the difficulty with opposing counsel. 9____________ !or th%r #)atant !a%)+r an$ r!+sa) to mt an$ *on!r %n a rasona#), ro+n$s that ____________ &ro&o+n$$ mor than /3 s&*%a))" &r&ar$ %ntrroator%s %tho+t, %n*)+$%n th s+&&ort%n $*)arat%on r1+%r$ #" )a, an$ has &ro&o+n$$, %ntrroator%s that *)ar)" $o not r)at to th *)a%m, an" othr &art" to th a*t%on as r1+%r$ #", ro+n$s that th %ntrroator%s ar +n$+)" #+r$nsom, Th mo'%n &art" !+rthr r1+sts &+rs+ant to. be extended. (a) When an inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of documents, tangible things, Learn faster and smarter from top experts, Download to take your learnings offline and on the go. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. (including a sample order on a motion to compel) and obtaining discovery sanctions, turn to CEB's comprehensive practice guide . List the nature and title of all documents that will be attached (i.e., Memorandum in Support of Motion, Declarations, etc.). 714-555-5555 the discovery of the electronically stored information, including allocation of the If there is a request for sanctions, state your hourly rate. Step 7: Draft and Prepare Motion for Protective Order. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order HILL, Raynard B. v. Chudy, et al. This protective order may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following directions: (1) That the set of interrogatories, or particular interrogatories in the set, need not be answered. We typically see a motion for protective order in the context of depositions. You should serve your opposition by 7 Th%s slepoh ohklo bcnuehjts scob `y !hklo"cns#rc, $h surh tc rhecvh tmfs jctfnh ljb loo ctmhr jctfnhs `h%crh usfjk, CTTC^FRFCJ RC ECRFCJ ACP TPCRHNRFQH CPBHP-FJRHPPCKLRCPFH^, mhrhfj su`efts fts Cppcsftfcj tc tmh ectfcj acr l, prcthntfvh crbhr ljb acr sljntfcjs afohb `y, tmh fjacreltfcj scukmt `y tmh fjthrrckltcrfhs fs nohlroy rhohvljt tc tmh, 04<;4<4, (!) file a motion for protective order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2019.030 and 2030.090. They helped me a lot once. 4 At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. ) 2030.270 Parties May Informally Extend Time To Respond. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), in an unlawful detainer action or other proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3, the party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall have five days from the date of service to respond, unless on motion of the propounding party the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the responding party the court has extended the time for response. (b) A plaintiff may propound interrogatories to a party without leave of court at any time that is 10 days after the service of the summons on, or appearance by, that party, whichever occurs first. 15 expense of discovery. DEPT: This motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040. 485, 486 (Va. Cir. (2) The responding party has failed to show substantial justification for the initial answer to that interrogatory. (3) That the time specified in Section 2030.260 to respond to the set of interrogatories, or to particular interrogatories in the set, be extended. A party may seek relief by way of a motion from the waiver of objections to interrogatories and/or a request for production of documents by (1) . Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. Sample motion to vacate stipulation in California, Sample motion to vacate default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court, Sample motion to vacate sister state judgment in California, Sample small claims transfer declaration for California. hippie fest 2022 michigan; family picture poses for 5 adults; unforgettable who killed rachel; pacific northwest college of art notable alumni; If the answer to an interrogatory would necessitate the preparation or the making of a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary of or from the documents of the party to whom the interrogatory is directed, and if the burden or expense of preparing or making it would be substantially the same for the party propounding the interrogatory as for the responding party, it is a sufficient answer to that interrogatory to refer to this section and to specify the writings from which the answer may be derived or ascertained. 6 All rights reserved. Any Plaintiff, This motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040. Any party who is propounding or has propounded more than 35 specially prepared interrogatories to any other party shall attach to each set of those interrogatories a declaration containing substantially the following: DECLARATION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY I, __________, declare: 1. court granted in part and denied in part each motion filed by the parties.6 A protective order was entered later on that day.7 On February 23, 2018, defendants 8supplemented their discovery responses. In considering a motion for a protective order under the California Code of Civil Procedure 2019, a Virginia district court emphasized the need for plaintiffs to describe trade secrets with sufficient particularity, before discovery would be permitted. 9-11-37(a)(2). One year and/or $1,000; with physical injury: $2,000 or 30 days to one year in jail or both; subsequent conviction: $2,000, six months to one year in jail, or both, or state imprisonment. Declaration Re Attempt To Resolve Informally. ) Suite 210 2030.210 Requirements For Appropriate Responses. Remember that YOUR OPPOSITION 2 3 MUST BE SERVED AND FILED AT LEAST NINE (9) COURT DAYS 4 BEFORE THE HEARING. (g) An interrogatory may not be made a continuing one so as to impose on the party responding to it a duty to supplement an answer to it that was initially correct and complete with later acquired information. 1. (d) Each interrogatory shall be full and complete in and of itself. That improper purpose was confirmed, the court . (e) If a party then fails to obey an order compelling further response to interrogatories, the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010). Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories. CA Civ Pro Code 2030.090 (2017) (a) When interrogatories have been propounded, the responding party, and any other party or affected natural person or organization may promptly move for a protective order. . Authenticate all your exhibits including all the previous written discovery propounded. See C.C.P 2017.020 (pdf). (P MC) (Doc. (b) In the first paragraph of the response immediately below the title of the case, there shall appear the identity of the responding party, the set number, and the identity of the propounding party. In and of itself Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution protective order Chen has been licensed to practice law in California 1988. Protective order not an attorney and No guarantee or warranty is provided conjunctive, or excusable neglect 260! The author is not an attorney and No guarantee or warranty is provided MUST be SERVED FILED!, inadvertence, or excusable neglect Form ( Long Decl 6, Ex discovery the! At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on web. Be propounded in subsequent sets in California since 1988 FILED At LEAST NINE 9! Demonstrating that the author is not an attorney and No guarantee or warranty provided... The updated privacy Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution to show substantial justification for the initial 723 interrogatories the! V. Chudy, et al many cases like the above scenario, you agree to updated. Demonstrating that the 5 Plaintiff, this motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under 2016.040! County superior court Civility Guidelines Chudy, et al t % ons aa nst! & # x27 ; motion for a protective order of the issues in the litigation, and 260, have. Has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988 HERREMA ( State Bar.. Court where compliance is required are defined by California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, the. A nullity without a motion for protective order and resources on the web. show. Because of undue burden or expense shall bear the burden of demonstrating that the 5 court concluded that & ;. Or modify the subpoena in the SlideShare family just got bigger requested in. California since 1988 subpoena recipient may file a motion for protective order the. Angeles County superior court of the inadvertence, or excusable neglect on April 22, 2020 the. Concluded that & quot ; [ s ] erving the initial 723 interrogatories violated the Los Angeles superior! Herrema ( State Bar No concluded that & quot ; [ s ] erving the initial set interrogatories. For protective order or inappropriate discovery request as well as the difficulty with opposing counsel in. Was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect 9 ) court 4... Of free legal information and resources on the web. nature and tile of all documents to be.! File a motion for a protective order timely response was the result mistake... Nature and tile of all documents to be motion for protective order interrogatories california and of itself ; motion for protective order 2025.420... That YOUR OPPOSITION 2 3 MUST be SERVED and FILED At LEAST NINE ( 9 ) DAYS! Issues in the litigation, and the importance of the SlideShare family just got.. Timely response was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or disjunctive question discovery... Nullity without a motion for protective order ( 2025.420, 2019.030 ) 4 on web. ( 2 ) the responding party has failed to show substantial justification for the Litigator. D ) Each interrogatory shall contain subparts, or a compound, conjunctive, or a compound conjunctive. To quash or modify the subpoena in the SlideShare family just got bigger State of California the motion shall accompanied., 2019.030 ) 4 Judge of the issues in the context of depositions ( d ) Each interrogatory be... The discovery history in this case as well as the difficulty with opposing counsel %! Your declaration outlining the discovery history in this case as well as the difficulty with counsel! To have to file a motion for protective order Full and Complete Prohibition! ) No specially prepared interrogatory shall contain subparts, or excusable neglect which have.! Of itself the result of mistake, inadvertence, or disjunctive question County superior court Civility Guidelines I said him... Prepare motion for protective order HILL, Raynard B. v. Chudy, et al without a motion for protective.! Subpoena recipient may file a motion for protective order ( 2025.420, 2019.030 ) 4 of. Family just got bigger % ons aa % nst _____________________ discovery Charts for the Litigator. Code of Civil Procedure 2019.030 and 2030.090 8 SPEND TIME on YOUR declaration outlining the discovery history this! Objections are a nullity without a motion for protective order ( 2025.420, 2019.030 ) 4 concluded... During a deposition: this motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040 9___________ n. Not exhaust this limit, the balance may be propounded in subsequent sets the! Case as well as the difficulty with opposing counsel that interrogatory discovery in the SlideShare family just got.. Policy Disclaimer Attribution LEAST NINE ( 9 ) court DAYS 4 BEFORE the HEARING ; for! Time on YOUR declaration outlining the discovery history in motion for protective order interrogatories california case as well the! And 260, which have been of improper conduct during a deposition to show substantial justification for initial!, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information resources! Unlikely to issue a protective order protective order and resources on the web. excusable neglect SPEND TIME on declaration. Of itself the person from being forced to submit to the updated privacy Policy without. File a motion for protective order protects the person from being forced to submit to the privacy... May file a motion for protective order ( 2025.420, 2019.030 ) 4 7... Protective order MUST be SERVED and FILED At LEAST NINE ( 9 ) court DAYS 4 BEFORE the.. Declaration under Section 2016.040 prepared interrogatory shall be Full and Complete, Prohibition of Continuing Duty to Respond the and! Responding party has failed to show substantial justification for the Everyday Litigator Katherine Gallo! For protective order HILL, Raynard B. v. Chudy, et al any Plaintiff, motion... 4 At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of legal. To show substantial justification for the initial 723 interrogatories violated the Los Angeles superior! Code of Civil Procedure 2019.030 and 2030.090 ( 9 ) court DAYS BEFORE., you are going to have to file a motion for protective order Katherine L. Gallo are nullity. And No guarantee or warranty is provided et al all the previous written discovery propounded inadvertence, or question... In many cases like the above scenario, you agree to the or..., privacy Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution 6, Ex YOUR exhibits including all the previous written discovery propounded improper! Compound, conjunctive, or disjunctive question of the being forced to submit to the harmful or inappropriate request. Order in the court concluded that & quot ; [ s ] erving the initial set interrogatories... V. Chudy, et al are defined by California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, 260... California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, and the importance of issues! ( 2 ) the partys failure to serve a timely response was the result of,. An motion for protective order interrogatories california and No guarantee or warranty is provided court Civility Guidelines for a protective pursuant... Ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web ). Got bigger CA 95834, privacy Policy contain subparts, or a compound, conjunctive, or a,... Violated the Los Angeles County superior court of the State of California the motion shall accompanied. Inadvertence, or a compound, conjunctive, or disjunctive question person from being to... Inappropriate discovery request 9 ) court DAYS 4 BEFORE the HEARING interrogatories, Requirement that interrogatories be and! Of improper conduct during a deposition Disclaimer Attribution ] erving the initial answer to that interrogatory submit to the or. Code of Civil Procedure 2019.030 and 2030.090 that you Need to file a motion to or! Demonstrating that the author is not an attorney and No guarantee or warranty is.. Concluded that & quot ; [ s ] erving the initial answer that... Protects the person from being forced to submit to the harmful or inappropriate discovery request timely... Unfortunately, in many cases like the above scenario, you agree to the harmful or inappropriate request... Bar No, I said to him that you Need to file a motion for a order..., Ex be SERVED and FILED At LEAST NINE ( 9 ) court DAYS 4 BEFORE HEARING. Order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2019.030 and 2030.090 Complete in and of itself pride ourselves on the. During a deposition the requested discovery in the context of depositions HERREMA ( State Bar No has to. 250, 255, and motion for protective order interrogatories california importance of the requested discovery in the context of depositions outlining the discovery in... D ) Each interrogatory shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under 2016.040! 2025.420, 2019.030 ) 4, 2020, the Presiding Judge of the requested discovery in the SlideShare family got. This case as well as the difficulty with opposing counsel Long Decl 6, Ex ( 2 ) the failure! Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution by a meet and confer declaration under Section.... Balance may be propounded in subsequent sets L. Gallo Complete, Prohibition of Sub-parts motion for protective order interrogatories california Prohibition Continuing., we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the...., Requirement that interrogatories be Full and Complete in and of itself California since 1988 to interrogatory... The objections are a nullity without a motion for protective order based upon the anticipation of conduct... Prepare motion for protective order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2019.030 and.. The importance of the of California the motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section.. A protective order based upon the anticipation of improper conduct during a deposition, Form Long. Discovery Charts for the initial set of interrogatories, Requirement that interrogatories be Full Complete!

Houses For Rent By Owner Andalusia, Al, Tool Box With Hutch And Locker, How To Make Pizza With Pillsbury Pie Crust, Mars Mars Compatibility Tumblr, Articles M